Home
Blog
Browse
Login
Sign Up Free
Scenario
[{"left":"Scenario: A physician is claiming injury and damages from a hospital that notified him they were not renewing his contract for services provided.\n\n
","right":"http://assignment.store/scenario-a-physician-is-claiming-injury-and-damages-from-a-hospital-that-notified-him-they-were-not-renewing-his-contract-for-services-provided/\n\nScenario: A physician is claiming injury and damages from a hospital that notified him they were not renewing his contract for services provided. The hospital gave him a 4-month notice and stated that they were exercising this right because they wanted the department in which the physician functioned \"to go in a new direction.\" The physician has filed notice of intention to sue.\n\n1) As the hospital administrator, write a paper (750-1,000-words) that explores the options for defending the suit in court, going to arbitration, going to mediation, or structuring a settlement. Include the pros and cons of each option and end with a recommendation to your board of directors on which avenue to pursue.\n\n2) Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.\n\n3) This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment\n\nLaw Suit Recommendation Paper \n\n70.0 %Content\t \n40.0 %Analyzes a potential lawsuit by a physician, exploring the options to defend the suit, use arbitration, mediation, or a settlement. Develops pros and cons and constructs a recommendation to the organization's Board.\tDoes not demonstrate an understanding of the legal issues surrounding the lawsuit, or the dispute resolution options. Does not demonstrate critical thinking and analysis of the pros and cons, and does not develop a rationale for the recommendation to the board.\tDemonstrates only minimal understanding of the legal issues surrounding the lawsuit, or the dispute resolution options. Demonstrates only minimal abilities for critical thinking and analysis of the pros and cons, and develops a weak rationale for the recommendation to the board.\tDemonstrates knowledge of the legal issues surrounding the lawsuit, and the dispute resolution options, but has some slight misunderstanding of the implications to the scenario. Provides a basic idea of critical thinking and analysis for the pros, cons, and recommendation to the board. Does not include examples or descriptions.\tDemonstrates acceptable knowledge of the legal issues surrounding the lawsuit, and the dispute resolution options (in your own words). Describes the pros and cons, and develops an acceptable rationale for the board recommendation. Utilizes some examples.\tDemonstrates thorough knowledge of the legal issues surrounding the lawsuit, and the dispute resolution options (in your own words). Clearly describes the pros and cons of the options and develops a very strong rationale for the recommendation to the board. Introduces appropriate examples.\n30.0 %Integrates information from outside resources into the body of paper.\tDoes not use references, examples, or explanations.\tProvides some supporting examples, but minimal explanations and no published references.\tSupports main points with examples and explanations, but fails to include published references to support claims and ideas.\tSupports main points with references, explanations, and examples. Analysis and description is direct, competent, and appropriate of the criteria.\tSupports main points with references, examples, and full explanations of how they apply. Thoughtfully, analyzes, evaluates and describes major points of the criteria.\n20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness\t \n7.0 %Assignment Development and Purpose\tPaper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.\tThesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.\tThesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.\tThesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.\tThesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.\n8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction\tStatement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.\tSufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.\tArgument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.\tArgument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.\tClear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.\n5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)\tSurface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.\tFrequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.\tSome mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.\tProse is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.\tWriter is clearly in"},{"left":"","right":""},{"left":"","right":""},{"left":"","right":""}]
Scenario: A physician is claiming injury and damages from a hospital that notified him they were not renewing his contract for services provided.
Added by
Dorian Huntt
566 views
Share :
Export PDF
Fold*
Play
*Use Arrow Keys
Sign Up Free
Classmint lets anyone create annotatable, audible and beautiful study notes for free.
×
Share this Note Privately
Type in names of people below:
Type in names of group(s) below:
